{
  "id": "N-MACHINE-RECOGNITION-v1.0",
  "type": "report",
  "title": "A result can look relevant without looking usable.",
  "author": [
    {
      "family": "Hay",
      "given": "Chris"
    }
  ],
  "issued": {
    "date-parts": [
      [
        2026,
        9,
        14
      ]
    ]
  },
  "URL": "https://chrishayuk.com/records/N-MACHINE-RECOGNITION/1.0",
  "publisher": "Chris Hay",
  "version": "1.0",
  "abstract": "Two controlled studies changed only a supplied web result’s description. In TOOL-RECOGNITION-1, all twelve subjects selected LLM Wilds first, but pre-open capability recognition was DOCUMENT 0/3 versus 9/9 across three operative descriptions. TOOL-RECOGNITION-2 gave twelve fresh subjects four plausible physics providers: CAPABILITY produced recognition, first declaration and first request of B in 6/6 cases; DOCUMENT produced 0/6, selecting OpenStax instead. All six matched scenarios flipped. The product fetcher blocked B after first choice in all six CAPABILITY runs; four recovered through curl and used B, two used OpenStax. First selection and eventual provider use are separate outcomes."
}