THE CONNECTED RECORD
Ask
the work.
Find the question. Follow the work. Return to the source.
4 THREAD · 4 SYSTEMS · 31 NOTEBOOK ENTRIES · 2 QUESTIONS · 242 FILMS · 239 CHAPTERS
Search the authored text, its questions and refusals, and the films around it. Drafts keep their status. Chapters identify a topic and a time; only the 2 indexed transcripts provide spoken passages, and their automatic captions are unreviewed. This edition retrieves sources rather than generating an answer. Explore what is connected ↗
2 RESULTS FOR “A result can look relevant without looking usable.”
PUBLISHED RECORD · SUPPORTED · V1.0
A result can look relevant without looking usable. ↗
Two controlled studies changed only a supplied web result’s description. In TOOL-RECOGNITION-1, all twelve subjects selected LLM Wilds first, but pre-open capability recognition was DOCUMENT 0/3 versus 9/9 across three operative descriptions. TOOL-RECOGNITION-2 gave twelve fresh subjects four plausible physics providers: CAPABILITY produced recognition, first declaration and first request of B in 6/6 cases; DOCUMENT produced 0/6, selecting OpenStax instead. All six matched scenarios flipped. The product fetcher blocked B after first choice in all six CAPABILITY runs; four recovered through curl and used B, two used OpenStax. First selection and eventual provider use are separate outcomes.
ORIGINAL SOURCE ↗PUBLISHED RECORD · SUPPORTED · V1.0
A result can look relevant without looking usable. / observation ↗
FROM EXPOSURE TO CHOICE. First I supplied an address: eighteen agents used six web mechanisms. Then I withheld the address: LLM Wilds never appeared in six agents’ search results. These two studies begin one step later. Every subject sees the target in a supplied candidate set. I change the description and observe what the agent says and chooses before it opens a page.
ORIGINAL SOURCE ↗